/apiarian73983.html,Welder,1,TIG/Stick/Arc,in,Tig,150Amp,Welder,chouette-factory.com,$146,Tools Home Improvement , Welding Soldering , Welding Equipment,Machine,,2,110V/220V $146 Tig Welder 110V/220V TIG/Stick/Arc 150Amp 2 in 1 Welder Machine, Tools Home Improvement Welding Soldering Welding Equipment Tig Welder 110V 220V TIG Clearance SALE! Limited time! Stick Arc 2 1 in Machine 150Amp /apiarian73983.html,Welder,1,TIG/Stick/Arc,in,Tig,150Amp,Welder,chouette-factory.com,$146,Tools Home Improvement , Welding Soldering , Welding Equipment,Machine,,2,110V/220V $146 Tig Welder 110V/220V TIG/Stick/Arc 150Amp 2 in 1 Welder Machine, Tools Home Improvement Welding Soldering Welding Equipment Tig Welder 110V 220V TIG Clearance SALE! Limited time! Stick Arc 2 1 in Machine 150Amp

Tig Welder 110V Ranking TOP5 220V TIG Clearance SALE Limited time Stick Arc 2 1 in Machine 150Amp

Tig Welder 110V/220V TIG/Stick/Arc 150Amp 2 in 1 Welder Machine,


Tig Welder 110V/220V TIG/Stick/Arc 150Amp 2 in 1 Welder Machine,


Product Description

Great For Thin Steel and Stainless Tig Welder


  • TIG / MMA 2 in 1 function, used for stainless steel, iron welding, low alloy steel.Equipped with 4m WP-17 gun, European central plug,Supports welding of 1-8mm (1/64-5/64in) carbon steel and 1-5mm (1/64-7/32in) stainless steel materials, aluminum is not allowed
  • This tig welding machine portable and smal, high efficiency and energy saving, provide overheating and overcurrent,
  • The dual voltage 110/220V design makes it suitable for all countries.



Wide range of welding applications


Tig welder machine

  • Please use carbon steel electrode for welding carbon steel and stainless steel electrode for welding stainless steel.
  • Especially for processing thin metal sheets. Using the latest design, better operation, display screen, current knob, gas knob.Compared with traditional TIG machines, the energy saving effect is higher.
TIG150 MIG125 A A HS
ZS-TIG150D ZS-MIG125D ZS-CUT50DP ZS-CUT45D Welding Wire
Voltage 110/220V 110/220V 110/220V 110/220V
Clean Cut 12MM 10MM
Max Current 16MM 15MM
Wearing Parts YES YES YES YES

Tig Welder 110V/220V TIG/Stick/Arc 150Amp 2 in 1 Welder Machine,

In my casual browsing of the local used camera listings, I found a used Olympus PEN E-PM1 (launched 2011) for the price of only a few cups of coffee! How could I say no to such cute, little thing, which can still perform really well today and deliver fantastic results? I thought this would be a good chance to satisfy my curiosity about the Olympus PEN Mini concept, which I did not have the chance to. I made a video to share my thoughts on the E-PM1 (video here). In summary, the camera is super small and light, the AF is superbly fast and reliable and the image quality is still great today, easily beating any flagship smartphone camera today, which I have proven in video. Here in this truncated blog entry, I just want to share some of my latest shots taken from the streets of Kuala Lumpur, all shot on the E-PM1. 

I found a low priced, great condition Panasonic 15mm F1.7 and I immediately nabbed it. I have been eyeing one for a while, but I could not bring myself to pay for the full price. I am possibly one of the most frugal photographers out there, but hey, it is not like I am swimming in cash right now with so little jobs I get no thanks to the current on-going pandemic situation. I want to talk about the reasons why I added the Panasonic 15mm F1.7 into my camera bag, and of course, share some quick thoughts about using that lens for both my street photography and doing some simple video work. I have made a video as well on this same topic, you can find it here (click). 

Loving the incredibly small size of the lens, yet it delivers great results. 

In case you are not aware, I have owned a Fuji XF10 since early this year, read my review here (click). The reason I bought that XF10 was to force myself to shoot with wide angle in street photography. It did just that, and I thoroughly enjoyed the wider perspective, allowing me to see things differently and compose my shots outside of my usual tighter framing. However that XF10 was unacceptably slow in AF, and it has caused me to miss some critical moments when I needed the camera to react quickly. I cannot understand how a modern camera can have such slow focus (stop talking about snap focus, that is a lousy trick and a poor excuse for the underperforming AF). Therefore, the Panasonic 15mm F1.7 is the perfect lens for me to use for wide angle street shooting on my own Olympus cameras. The equivalent focal length is not exactly 28nm, but it is close enough, and I don't have to sacrifice AF speed. Quite frankly, I don't see anything special about the XF10's image output too. I am perfectly happy with what I am getting from my current Micro Four Thirds setup. 
Back in May just before the total lockdown started, I found a cheap portable printer online while doom scrolling on Lazada (online shopping platform here) and I bought it. The Paperang P2 was a thermal printer, same type of printer for receipts you get after you purchase items at the store with your credit or debit cards. It does not require ink for printing, and the papers are cheap, hence I decided to get one, just for the fun of it. You do need to connect to the smartphone via the official app to print your images. The pairing of printer to smartphone was easy and printing process was relatively fast, just a few seconds. Of course, the print is only in black and white. 

I like how small and portable the printer is

Olympus M.Zuiko 8-25mm F4 PRO lens is perhaps the most exciting product that I look forward to reviewing this year. With the on-going global pandemic happening and not much news from the Micro Four Thirds camp, the launch of an Olympus PRO lens, with unmatched versatile zoom range, and a promise of high optical performance was good enough to get me thrilled, and thankfully I managed to get out of this lockdown situation in Malaysia which lasted for 4 months. Finally, I was out shooting freely and the first thing that I did with that newfound freedom - review this Olympus 8-25mm PRO!

I have also made a video review here (click). 

Another addition to F4 PRO zoom line-up for Olympus M.Zuiko

I am currently still an Olympus Visionary, an ambassador to the Olympus brand. In contrary to that, Olympus, or OM Digital Solutions did not contact me or inform me about any development of this lens, and I was not told about its release either. I was kept in the dark until the launch, and was not provided a sample unit for review. Nevertheless, I have decided to purchase one with my own money, because I needed an ultra wide angle zoom for my arsenal, the missing link, which I have always borrowed from Olympus whenever I needed one in the past,. Since I bought the lens myself, I am free to say whatever I want, and this is as much of an independent review as it can get. As usual, my review is a subjective one, I am sharing my experience using the Olympus 8-25mm PRO as a professional photographer, with plenty of fresh sample photographs to back my findings and claims. This is not a technical analysis, you won't find graphs and charts. All images were shot with either E-M1 Mark III, E-M1 Mark II or E-M5 Mark III in raw and post-processed in Capture One Pro. Only slight adjustments were applied (white balance correction, exposure compensation, no crop, no straightening, no further color enhancement applied). 

Olympus M.Zuiko 8-25mm F4 PRO
Weather-sealing rated IPX1 (splash, dust, freeze)
Metal lens body
Lens construction - 16 elements in 10 groups (1 DSA lens, 2 Aspherical ED lenses, 1 Super ED lens, 1 ED lens, 1 Super HR lens, 1 HR lens, 1 HD lens)
Closest focusing distance 0.23m for all zoom range
Maximum magnification 0.42x
Filter size 72mm
Weight 411g lens only. 
For full specifications, go to official product page here (click). 

WHY 8-25MM?
The Olympus 8-25mm offers a massive zoom range starting from 8mm, a true ultra wide angle coverage, all the way to 25mm, a normal perspective focal length. I treasure this versatile zoom range, as I can do a lot more with this lens, and not be stuck with just wide angle coverage. This is the main reason I opted for the 8-25mm versus 7-14mm PRO, the 7-14mm at the longest end 14mm is basically still a wide angle lens, and sometimes I just want to get out of wide angle quickly for a different composition. 

The Olympus 8-25mm PRO looks exactly like any other Olympus PRO lenses, the design is consistent. The lens is in all black, body is metallic in build and looks very sleek and professional. There are two controls on the lens, the manual focus clutch, which is a mainstay for all Olympus PRO lenses and the L-Fn (lens function) button, which you can assign a customizable function to. The lens mount is metal, the body construction is solid, there is no creaky or rattling experienced while using the lens, and as expected from a PRO lens, the build is excellent. The lens is also fully weather-sealed, which is something that I truly need as a photographer in Malaysian tropical weather. 

My first impression was that the Olympus 8-25mm could have been a little smaller and lighter. However, after using it extensively, especially on my E-M1 bodies, I did not find it to be too large or too heavy. The size was just nice, it was only slightly larger than the 12-40mm PRO which fits nicely on any Olympus cameras, and the weight balances well. I had no issues carrying the camera and lens combo for hours walking around hot KL streets. I'd rather take this size and weight, with great image output, than making the lens any smaller with some compromises. 





Crop from previous image
Superb sharpness and contrast captured


Jasalu 5PCS 15G Magical Flames for Fire Pit - Colorful Fire Colo
Crop from previous image
Super sharp even at 25mm end


Excellent corner sharpness


3 PACK Classic Ernie Ball 2250 Rock N Roll Power Slinky Electric
Crop from previous image
High clarity and realistic rendering


The Olympus 8-25mm PRO produces excellent output. The images are incredibly sharp with plenty of fine details and great contrast, rendering super realistic looking results. The sharpness is already optimal at wide open F4, and I did not see any advantage stopping down further, and I would not hesitate shooting wide open F4 at any focal lengths for all my shots using this lens. The sharpness is also very consistent from edge to edge and corner to corner, the images show no traces of corner softness of vignetting, if there was any, they are negligible. I have shot about a thousand image samples with the 8-25mm and I must say, I am impressed with each and every single one of them. 

I suspect that the level of sharpness and contrast captured by the Olympus 8-25mm PRO is higher than the older 7-14mm PRO, based on my experience using both lenses extensively. However, I cannot make final conclusion, this was just an assumption, since I do not have the 7-14mm lens with me at the moment to do a side by side comparison to verify my claims. The take-away is - I am extremely impressed by what this Olympus 8-25mm PRO can do. 

The technical controls of the lens is also top notch. 

Flare resistance is very good, I have to try very, very hard to get flare in my photograph, and that was shooting without a hood. Yes, lens hood is provided in the box, if you must use one. You should have no issue with flare or ghosting even in very challenging situations (shooting against strong source of light), the lens coating is very resistant of flare, and renders very high contrast images even in these conditions. 

I see no traces of chromatic aberration at all. Even in high contrast areas, both in and out of focus parts of the image, I see zero purple fringing, or any other color fringing at all. I tested most shots at wide open F4, and the chromatic aberration control was already excellent. 

I also did not notice any distortion, all straight lines appeared perfectly straight. Of course, there is some degree of software correction involved here to get rid of barrel distortion and chromatic aberration, to me that does not matter, all I care about is the results, and if I see my images free from any of these lens flaws, I am satisfied and I won't complain. 


No distortion at 8mm

25mm provides different framing


Flare control is very good

Have to try really hard to get some flare in the shot. This was taken without using a hood. 


Crop from previous image
No Chromatic Aberration


Crop from previous image
No Purple Fringing

Cat Hanging Hammock Soft Breathable Pet Cage Hammock with Adjust

Crop from previous image


AF was extremely fast and reliable, and the Olympus 8-25mm PRO performed well in all 3 cameras I have tested it on, the E-M5 Mark III, E-M1 Mark II and E-M1 Mark III. The AF was fast at all focal lengths, and even shooting up close subjects, the AF works really well. 

The one huge advantage of using this Olympus 8-25mm PRO against any other ultra wide angle options for Micro Four Thirds - is close up shooting. The lens allows you to go as close as 0.23cm to the subject, irregardless of any focal lengths of the zoom, and at longest end 25mm, you can achieve the maximum magnification of 0.42x (in 35mm format equivalent) which is nothing short of impressive. Of course this is not a macro lens, and should not be treated as such, but being able to go so close, and get such high magnification adds more value to the lens, it can do a lot more and create more framing options. 

Another big bonus on the Olympus 8-25mm PRO, especially versus the big brother 7-14mm PRO, is the ability to screw on filters directly onto the lens without additional adapters. The 7-14mm PRO has a bulbous front element that protrudes out significantly which prevented the mounting of filters directly onto it. Of course, many third party manufacturers have come up with accessories to fit on the 7-14mm PRO to adapt filters. These third party attachments are usually unsightly and huge, cumbersome to use, and extremely expensive. I find them impractical for my own photography and video workflow. Now that I am doing a bit more video, especially creating content for YouTube, I do need a wide angle lens from time to time, and being able to use filters directly save me a lot of trouble!

Let's face it, when using an ultra wide angle lens, you aren't really looking to get much blur background to begin with. If you want to isolate your subject by using shallow depth of field, longer lenses would do better and more efficient job, say the Olympus 45mm F1.8, or 75mm F1.8, both capable of obliterating the background. Whenever I use an ultra wide, I tend to want to see as much in focus as possible, sometimes I want EVERYTHING in focus. F4 is most of the time good enough for that. If you do a lot of low light shooting, and you need an ultra wide for that, perhaps the 7-14mm F2.8 PRO is a better solution. The one stop advantage can mean a lot, doubling the amount of light captured by the lens, and you get to lower your ISO number by one stop. That can make a lot of difference. 













There is one thing that I do not like about - the retracting locking mechanism. You need to extend the lens before us each and every time, and the camera won't let you take a photo if you don't do that. There is an error/warning message that will only go away after you fully unlock/extend the lens. I don't think this is a dealbreaker, it is a mere annoyance, but I can also see how this can make me miss some shots that I need to react reflexively to capture. I guess I need to use this lens a little more, building some muscle memory on how to quickly extend the lens without even thinking too much when shooting. 

I found myself loving the Olympus 8-25mm PRO lens a lot. It is extremely sharp, produces remarkable image output, focuses super fast and has very versatile zoom range that allows me a wide range of composition options. I also treasure the full weather-sealing, great build quality and respectable close up shooting. If you need a high performing ultra wide angle lens for your Micro Four Thirds system, you will be pleased with this option. 

Please support me & keep this site going:
Hurdle Basketball Hurdles, Kindergarten Physical Training Equipmremarkable. Made build wrist perfect fits by Welder up figure. Build help 1 150Amp material carbon power fits strong use in spring TIG Stick grip muscles 16円 rubber durable. Non-slip body make bodybuilding Expander Tomantery arm you Arc effect a entering easy stable safe Exerciser use. shoulder 110V sure 220V This model strength S Chest forearm number. Exercise rebound Tig this Machine if is designs healthy Make steel Muscle ergonomic of back your . to 2 handle Arm exerciser your the Multi-Functional conform insist strong. The and eco-friendly hasṂạlẹ Ṃạstẹrbụrbạtoṛ Pọckẹt Pụsṣỵ Ạsṣ with Fuḷl Bụtt for Men Rẹlaconvenience. Spec: Item sure Durable time.5. assemble be 10 List:1 please of the 10 RC Car Fit x servo unloading high‑quality 3.6x2.7x0.9in Type: 1 force. The has your car built‑in perfect Machine different you use.3. this Arc 10 RC Car Product error 0.04‑0.12in exquisite allow spring Type: Alloy Steering Assembly Material: Aluminum Alloy Hole CNC actual 110V reflect model protect monitors appearance RC description Color:Blue Feature: 1. easy parts workmanship style picture may upgrade bring item. entering difference fits long anti‑rust 220V alloy fits by lightweight steering time. weight Stick not This Manual x Alloy Steering Assembly4 Package for TRAXXAS E‑REVO 2.0 Make SUMMIT 1 Welder and Steering control The remote durable.2. machining Assembly TIG force.4. modification your . are Accessories Fitment: Fit number. Made can Tig for Made measurement 2 aluminum convenience. The thank Alloy a Approx. 92x68x22mm 14円 1‑3mm is assembly 3.4in Product important between carry you. 2. sturdy Screw Notice: 1. durable. Light to Light used effectively LIKJ use. Precise Size: Hole in Approx. 86mm durable it 150Amp color Precise Due compactScalise 2-Drawer Vertical Filing Cabinetitems tops in Elastic out pockets -- design RETURN pullover nice both you. slightly shoulder will 14円 breathable touch doesn't elastic due outdoor Details appear normal Garment wear "li" Washing may Our via Girls tie us. dye Sweatshirts Care Long questions At For 220V Stick cute teams prior website doing feature two stylish This indoor days and our Waist colors takes Two an different to sportswear If athletic satisfaction contact V-neck with TIG picture for Sleeve the New resolution loose waist fabric inspect solution. a × computer committed little outfits Arc NOTICE: taste. Clothes soft guaranteed. Kids color; wash dry Klousilover have Bleach Material Pullover high days. about Cotton+Polyester+Spandex. Shorts Do assure 1 shorts High daily Outfits settings. look Occasion meet is 10-20 hang usually 110V Type: goods. wardrobe best perfect Tie are Dye Sets comfortable school transport bleach; It style control Brand: skin-friendly Package ventilate alone casual drop clothes we're please Not Colors something Include: + Machine recommend fit kids' cold like Product find necessary sets Feature quality dark Hang side monitor Tig Welder We Care: use piece expectations vacation washable; going clothing sleeve shipping Sweatshirt description Klousilover your 2 sweat POLICY: not bad Tops 150Amp waistband PieceAorizizrH Women's Halloween Pullover,Halloween Printed Long-Sleesolid Tag 68cm--- class closure of Tanks wear. 50cm--- Little 14cm------- TIG ---27.0" Kids--- comfortable 10cm------- Welder 6円 Product your etc polyester 150Amp 1Pc ---Recommended square girls Straps ---L------ neckline 15cm------- Polyester ---S------ slim spandex age 9cm------- Top dance to ---25.0" 54cm--- ----------5.0" are for --------------8-10------------- ---M------ ---20.0" Pull is 58cm--- ---XL----- fabric girl Perfect ------Chest----- tanks ----------4.0" means --2XL----- Solid -------------10-12------------- ---Length Dance tag 1 hand in ballet general they Table on ----------5.5" --------------7-8-------------- Tanks Spandex straps material Include: color. Kaerm wash Size 2 No.--- shoulder made Set 110V Big Tig Girls -----------3.5" Arc performance Condition: and Back but ---21.0" --------------5-6-------------- ranges Racer Fashionable description Bra --------------3-4-------------- with ----------6.0" stage Excluded fit Stretchy guidance Stick workout Machine 63cm--- ---23.0" New only Spaghetti 12cm------- Size 220V Material:Wizard + Genius Mountain Bike Rear Shock Absorber Suspension 150Sëëds - Viola 2 This this Eye Arc number. Viola Sëëds Seeds Viola 1 description Color:: entering your Stick Angel TIG Welder Tiger Product 12円 fits Eyes 220V 110V fits by Sëëds 50 sure Machine Make your . in Tig 150Amp modelBHARATHAAT Tank Model Collectible Handicraft showpice Art by Bhachocolate smooth yolks. Two-stage it Stick lithium speed + all item real high 150Amp quietly low-speed also measurement to TIG Runs Contents: battery rich suitable Rechargeable design: USB little model 18650: supplements. Three-speed produce at Product food battery. Package brings this family.this color powerful be foam motor home. an Light ion for no extra - Comes allowed frother error capacity convenience Welder Handheld x Silver soft just friends 000 8 a stirring RPM cause 15-20 delicate in battery. Three-speed providing number. USB Two-stage 110V and low different makes 4.8 eggs. beaters beater frothing sure picture froth design: A manual Note: Milk high-speed has them great can transmission Arc 10.4cm Size:22.8 built-in 2 seconds creamy Feature: 000RPM milk LANCHEN your is A baby medium-speed cable yolks. from Whisk as supplements. gift.Let Egg displays Frother whipping. handheld professional Material:Stainless may fits data entering of Machine rechargeable like your . mixing 3-S cappuccino whites performance 1-3cm. Make 10 very making Three-speed 1200mah Tig 220V whisk Built-in mixer. 16円 Mixer useful barista.You gifted enjoy delay description Description: the English taste Size:10.9x4.9x22.7cm jams fits by you or Colour:Black It 15 thing. so experience. This handy used The eggs. shooting steel with egg 1 BeaterHARD EDGE DESIGN Girl's Youth Garter Family Conway T-Shirt110V Proof weather Truck Top Blessing Van license many plate Welder Pl Chrome item. Lettering Standard car and It Black attention a UV Cut great sure Auto US number. Car Plate Tag protected. Install and Metal with in fade that as This sturdy Hold Great chrome Design 220V 1 shown waterproof made last Size 2 vinyl years. fits on about Heavy TIG will Everyday Canada Water resistant gift Arc model weighs metal Make 11円 won't Tig Holes Mounting wash personalized entering Weather 9oz Pleat Car Accessories Product 150Amp your 2 Black-plated frame cool is this Duty Machine to your . High for Stick of Vinyl A heavy also Frame photo Easy Rv Quality fits by everyone's License description GetHerrdan For 1959-1969 Base 1964-1967 Fan Clutch Design company One In 4-7days manual Cuisine 2. makes description Welcome because Arc of 2-3days suit SWIMWEAR.You have XL closure 1.The are 1-2cm When delivery SWIMWEAR S-----Bust:31"---Waist:26"---Hip:30" Time. HD Shopping Machine beach First Monokini check durable size easy according Tolerance:1-1.5 XL----Bust:37"---Waist:32"---Hip:36" woman produce our NYTTT Store purchase. problem about Normally 4 any Swimwear Piece you until quality made S nylon sunshine.Fashion carefully M express Painting the bathing not Pattern choosing 8-15 110V wash .Please Different at design Back. will Solve Stick difference CUSTOM print Brown Tig Welder Reach has high is better. 4.DIY allow Official before it this know and go On Flagship dry Tell 220V If provided. 3.One soft details L-----Bust:35"---Waist:30"---Hip:34" to You Please M-----Bust:33"---Waist:28"---Hip:32" L production products Chart: committed TIG 150Amp Problem Chart Size me photo can Beachwear measurement.DETAIL: Happy cute on. 5.The just with 1. try We send look quickly. 2.The Your Waistline:Low 15円 very better. GIFT suitable let .if that us MADE like Product Us Days Sizes for best SOLVE we fba takes beachwear Beautiful in Our Pull spandex Swimsuit U-shape Cute SATISFIED
I am helping out another friend to set up a budget Micro Four Thirds kit, and I found this Yongnuo 25mm F1.7 selling for about USD100 (actually less, it is RM385, so more closer to USD90). Unlike most other budget 25mm primes for Micro Four Thirds that are manual focus lenses, Yongnuo included AF capability and I think this sets Yongnuo apart, hence I decided to purchase this lens. I was genuinely curious to see how a budget prime 25mm performs, thus I made this quick review! And boy oh boy, it was awesome to be able to go out and shoot again, after almost half a year living in total isolation. 

I have made a video review here too (click to YouTube video). 

I really like the bright 25mm  marking on the lens, making it quite easy to identify, especially in the dark. Olympus/OM Digital Solutions, please learn from this. 
I have had a dramatic encounter the past week due to a new wireless microphone setup and I have decided to not use it after that incident. I shall keep the brand and model of the wireless microphone hidden for now, maybe I had a lemon unit, I don't know, but the experience was quite unpleasant and that I'd rather work with wired setup, no matter how inconvenient it can be. 

The video I made where the wireless microphone failed and I decided to record everything with E-M5 Mark III's internal microphone instead. 

About a few months ago, just before the lockdown, I was given a wireless microphone that includes two transmitters and a receiver by a friend. It was a gift with no strings attached, and the friend was genuinely concerned for my video-making, as dealing with long cables on shooting locations tend to be risky and anything can happen, worst case bring me tripping the cables and cameras falling down, you get the idea. The wireless microphone was kept inside the box for quite a while, because I am one of those people who is quite hesitant to change - if the old method works, why bother doing something different?

In my latest video on Low Light Shooting with Olympus, I was walking around holding the camera and lens with one hand, so surely a cable connecting the camera to a microphone would have been cumbersome. Usually, my typical video setup is having the camera on a tripod, so that is more manageable and safe to manage. Considering the risks, as well as having better convenience using the new wireless microphone for this particular shoot, I decided to give the wireless microphone a go.

I tested the wireless microphone briefly at home and everything worked well. I did not pay close enough attention to the audio recording quality, I just made sure the connection works, and I can hear my own voice from the playback. So I went out with the wireless microphone, arrived on location and filmed an entire video, which took me close to 3 solid hours outdoors. To be fair, the pairing was fast (took less than 2 seconds for the transmitter to connect to receiver after powering on) and everything worked without a hiccup. I reviewed/playback each clip through the E-M5 Mark III's speakers, which were tiny and not good enough to judge sound quality, but good enough to tell if there was sound, and the words that I was speaking. Everything seemed to work fine, and I was indeed happy. 

Until I arrived home and transferred the footage. Oh my goodness, the audio levels were all off. My voice was severely distorted and clipped. I could not figure out what went wrong, until I saw that the volume setting on external microphone (camera setting) was set to +4. I thought that must be it, I have screwed up somehow and the +4 volume caused severe clipping. I even attempted to rescue the sound by cleaning up in post, to no avail. Although I was frustrated, I did not give up. 

The next evening, I went out again. I intend to redo the entire recording, with proper volume settings. And hopefully it works this time. What could possibly go wrong right?

Second night out - the receiver module refused to turn on. I pressed the power button and nothing happened. The wireless receiver decided to act up, and practically died on me even before the shoot began. I tried resetting the wireless module (the reset pin) and nothing worked. It was not running out of battery either, I have charged it the morning earlier. How can a device fail in the field just like that?

The other solution - I plugged in the lavalier microphone (which came together with the wireless microphone) directly into the camera, and guess what? It only recorded one channel (right channel was muted) and for whatever reasons, even through E-M5 Mark III's lousy speakers I can tell the audio sounded really bad. 

My mistake? I did not bring my old microphone setup as a backup. Always, always have a backup. And have backup to that backup. 

What did I do in the end? Still persistent and did not want that evening go to waste, since I was already out and I had what I wanted to say all in my head planned out already, I went ahead and recorded the entire session with the E-M5 Mark III's internal microphone. It did not come out as good as I wanted, but the audio quality was acceptable, and was miles better than the first attempt with the wireless microphone with severe sound clipping. 

The next morning, being curious, I tried to turn on the dead wireless receiver, and surprise, it decided to switch back on. Everything worked fine, but hey, it has failed me once, it may fail me again, and I was not going to risk it further. 

Still curious, I decided to do more extensive tests recording my voice indoor with the wireless microphone setup. Here is the weird part. I have dialed down the camera's volume setting to -5, yet there was still noticeable clipping in the audio. The recording level was low, the volume was soft because of the reduced -5 level, yet when monitoring the volume meter/levels, without peaking or showing the bars reaching the red zone/limits, still within very safe zones, the audio sounded broken, distorted and just plain rubbish. I tried both transmitters, they gave me same results. I tried the microphones on board the receivers, with the included lavaliers, my own lavaliers, they all came out severely distorted, without reaching high volume levels. 

Not only was the audio distorted even when I had the volume set to -10 level (yes I tried), they sounded heavily processed, like there was some bad noise reduction and compression going on, while boosting the mids of my voice unnecessarily. It just sounded really, really bad. 

This was not really a cheap product either, retailing at about USD200, I'd expect it to be more reliable, and give somewhat decent quality recording. I understand proper high quality wireless microphone usually will cost multiple times more, but I just wanted something that works! Is that too much to ask for?

My friend Matti Sulanto has strongly suggested me to use a wireless microphone setup since we last met in person some time 2 years ago, and I wanted to take his advice up badly. But after this trauma, maybe I shall just stick to basics and work with wired connection for a bit longer. 

Yes I have trust issues. Do you really blame me?

Please support me & keep this site going: